US remote tracking is recognized by medical institutions but still faces two major challenges

With the deepening of the medical reform in the United States, medical institutions are increasing the investment in remote tracking under the influence of the payment methods of value medical treatment, so as to better understand patients and intervene in time. Under the impetus of value-based medicine, the evaluation of curative effect becomes the basis for payment by the payer. This requires medical institutions and doctors to keep abreast of the development of the patient's condition, thereby reducing the rate of re-visiting or re-admission of the patient.

According to the latest research data provided by Spyglass Consulting Group, 84% of medical institutions have invested in remote patient monitoring systems, and 79% of hospitals have used analytical tools and big data to support their management. This is a big improvement compared to last year's data. Last year, the International Non-Profit Organization Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) conducted a telemedicine survey that found that only 26.1% of hospitals use remote patients.

Although medical institutions have increased the deployment of remote patient monitoring, how to implement real-time and effective remote monitoring is a big challenge. First, how to effectively and reliably integrate this data into the clinical workflow is very important. At present, doctors or medical institutions themselves are incapable of effectively analyzing and integrating large amounts of data. Moreover, the influx of large amounts of data has also made it impossible for hospitals to focus more on clinical issues. Therefore, medical institutions are still at a very early stage of how to handle remote patient monitoring data. It is difficult to say that remote monitoring can be effective before effective data integration and interpretation tools are smoothly embedded in the workflow.

Second, the enthusiasm of patient involvement is the biggest difficulty. Because remote monitoring requires patients to provide data outside the hospital, patients need to be motivated to use medically valuable wearable devices to collect data and provide it to the hospital. And many of the previous discussions have also clarified the inherent dilemma of remote monitoring: anti-humanity and compliance. Since chronic diseases are mainly caused by bad living habits, it is very difficult to change the patient's habits. There is a problem of anti-humanity. More patients can easily give up after further adhering to a new lifestyle. The monitoring was abandoned. The postoperative rehabilitation monitoring will be relatively better. After all, the time is short, but if the recovery time is longer, the challenge will still be faced. Compliance is a long-term topic, and many patients are difficult to adhere to, not to mention collecting data for a long time. Slow disease and recovery are a long-term process, and people are short-sighted. If you can't see the effect for a period of time, many patients will give up, but many times they need a long period of time to reflect the effect. come out.

Therefore, remote tracking does not currently have the potential for large-scale market development. Although the acceptance of medical institutions has increased and the willingness to remotely manage patients has become stronger, remote tracking is still facing a large bottleneck in terms of data integration and patient willingness. Moreover, as the village husband's diary pointed out in last year's article, tracking patient data and analyzing data requires a professional team to assist, not every doctor has time and ability to do it. This is a great pressure for hospitals and doctors, and it also hinders the possibility of large-scale development.

From the above brief analysis, the most urgent need for remote patient tracking is the need for a complete set of data integration, analysis and interpretation systems. Such systems are not universal and need to be adapted separately for different types of diseases. Some diseases may be Also need to be redeveloped. This determines that remote tracking cannot achieve explosive growth like remote consultations, and companies need to work in long-term market segments, but once they are widely recognized by medical institutions in this market, their overall development capabilities will be extremely Great improvement and strong core competitiveness.

And the question of how to mobilize the enthusiasm of patients is another type of company worth exploring. How to change the patient and effectively resolve the anti-human factors in remote tracking and improve patient compliance is a strong skill. Some companies have developed game-based methods to attract patients or through actual material stimulation. Attracting patients can only be effective for a while, and can't really improve the enthusiasm of patients in an effective long-term. How to improve patient participation will be the biggest challenge for value-for-money. Only patient participation can be effectively improved, and a results- and quality-oriented compensation system can be truly established.

Freeze Dryer

Freeze Dryer,Food Drugs Lyophilizer,Vacuum Lyophilizer Drying,Chemical Freeze Drying

Guangdong Widinlsa International Co.Ltd , https://www.widinlsas.com